This ridiculous article (shame on the once-great Scientific American) ignorantly misunderstands the nature of the sex binary: “Actual research shows that sex is anything but binary”. Sex is not defined by chromosomes, nor by anatomy, nor by psychology or sociology, nor by…
Resource type
Forum Post
Author/contributor
- Richard Dawkins [@RichardDawkins] (Author)
Title
This ridiculous article (shame on the once-great Scientific American) ignorantly misunderstands the nature of the sex binary: “Actual research shows that sex is anything but binary”. Sex is not defined by chromosomes, nor by anatomy, nor by psychology or sociology, nor by…
Forum/Listserv Title
Twitter
Post Type
Tweet
Date
1/30/24, 6:50 PM
Language
en
Accessed
1/30/24, 6:58 PM
Notes
“This ridiculous article (shame on the once-great Scientific American) ignorantly misunderstands the nature of the sex binary: “Actual research shows that sex is anything but binary”. Sex is not defined by chromosomes, nor by anatomy, nor by psychology or sociology, nor by…”
Citation
Richard Dawkins [@RichardDawkins]. (2024, January 30). This ridiculous article (shame on the once-great Scientific American) ignorantly misunderstands the nature of the sex binary: “Actual research shows that sex is anything but binary”. Sex is not defined by chromosomes, nor by anatomy, nor by psychology or sociology, nor by… [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1752403995174252724
Link to this record